Skip to content
Join our Newsletter

Letter: Whistler e-bike freeway is about more than climate action

'The RMOW should launch the e-bike highway in the name of safety, community, health, and the economy'
gettyebikeinfra
Does Whistler need to start thinking about e-bike-specific infrastructure? Photo by AJ_Watt / E+

I 100-per-cent agree with Vince Shuley: we need to build an e-bike freeway in Whistler (see Pique, June 11: The Outsider: How will e-bikes fit into Whistler’s future?). 

But what if we: Preserve the Valley Trail for recreation; reduce road wear, and maintenance costs; reduce road noise; reduce microplastic emissions (tires and brakes are the No. 1 source); reduce GHG emissions; reduce road casualties; and allow our kids to travel independently?

What if we: Increase physical activity; reduce anxiety and depression; increase sense of community; reduce health-care costs; improve air quality; reduce the need for expensive private automobiles; increase spending at local businesses; reduce traffic on Highway 99…

…and we still don’t make our emissions targets?

I don’t think that making these improvements in the name of climate action will drum up the political support needed. If there was support for meaningful climate action, the Resort Municipality of Whistler (RMOW) would already have a budget and a plan.

The RMOW should launch the e-bike highway in the name of safety, community, health, and the economy.

Brendan Ladner // Whistler