This week marks the annual meeting of the Union of BC Municipalities, and one should ask, when does being a politician go from a public service to a career choice with incredible benefits and pensions that the average person does not enjoy?
I would argue in their second term, which is why I suggest we need term limits for some of the following reasons:
Preventing Career Politicians: One of the primary arguments in favour of term limits is that they can prevent the emergence of career politicians who may become disconnected from the needs and concerns of their constituents. Term limits can encourage fresh faces and ideas in government.
Increased Accountability: Politicians who know they have limited time in office may be more inclined to make decisions that align with their constituents’ interests rather than focusing on securing re-election. This can lead to greater accountability.
Reducing Incumbency Advantage: Incumbent politicians often have a significant advantage when running for re-election, including access to resources and name recognition. Term limits can level the playing field for new candidates and parties.
There are some cons, such as loss of experience and loss of voter choice. But nah. When I see successive leaders promise electoral reform during election campaigns only to break those promises when in power, then I know how term limits must become a reality.
